Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Baco 438470
11-15-2022, 09:25 AM,
#21
RE: Baco 438470
(11-10-2022, 11:44 PM)Don McDowell Wrote: Yes I do. I prefer and my rifles agree that a bullet with some neck tension shoots best.
I also find tha shooting patched in a standard chamber the cases don’t expand quite like they do with a greaser.
If the size die sizes the case to tight for the patched bullet then I use an expander die that expands the mouth to .001 over the patches diameter

Don,
I’m a bit surprised by this. How much tension are you actually using? Is it enough to require a seating die?
My experience has mainly been with the 45-70. Of course, with the match load, the bullet is barely in the case so just enough neck tension to hold on to the bullet when it’s handled.
I’ve also developed a good shooting, short range, load with a 400 grain, groove sized PP bullet. It seats deep like your DD bullet. It does not like any neck tension and gives very nice accuracy if slip fitted in a fire formed case.
It looks like you’re on to a great shooting load! It sure is satisfying when we hit upon what these rifles like!
Jim
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 05-30-2022, 11:05 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 05-30-2022, 11:09 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 05-30-2022, 11:12 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Hiwall55 - 05-30-2022, 06:01 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 05-30-2022, 06:34 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 05-31-2022, 02:33 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 05-31-2022, 10:10 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 05-31-2022, 10:24 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 11-09-2022, 09:47 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-09-2022, 10:31 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 11-09-2022, 10:43 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-09-2022, 10:54 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 11-09-2022, 11:05 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-09-2022, 11:32 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 11-10-2022, 12:13 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-10-2022, 08:29 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-10-2022, 08:31 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 11-10-2022, 10:08 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 11-10-2022, 10:26 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-10-2022, 11:44 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by JKR - 11-15-2022, 09:25 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-15-2022, 10:13 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by JKR - 11-15-2022, 10:36 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-15-2022, 09:07 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by DirtySteve - 11-15-2022, 11:04 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by JKR - 11-15-2022, 12:17 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by JKR - 11-16-2022, 09:11 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-16-2022, 09:46 AM
RE: Baco 438470 - by JKR - 11-17-2022, 06:51 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-17-2022, 08:15 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Don McDowell - 11-21-2022, 09:49 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Kurt - 11-21-2022, 11:33 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 12-07-2022, 08:52 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Kurt - 12-07-2022, 11:04 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Tgc - 12-07-2022, 11:43 PM
RE: Baco 438470 - by Kurt - 12-08-2022, 03:00 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication