Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Buffalo Arms
08-15-2017, 11:40 PM,
#8
RE: Buffalo Arms
(08-15-2017, 06:01 PM)Steve Anderson Wrote: As a business person I would suppose Dave is keenly aware of the new web site short comings and would also suppose he's keenly troubled by it. It represents his business after all. A business person weighs on a daily basis the paths we take our business. We hope for the best, it doesn't always work out the way we might have hoped. This new site will in time be that good old site and we'll forget the day. Meanwhile, my phone works if I have troubles with technology. Buffalo Arms/Dave et al, are an asset to us. We'd be smart to support them the best we can.

I'll second that...! Good doin's.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Buffalo Arms - by Randy Bohannon - 08-15-2017, 09:41 AM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Fogman01 - 08-15-2017, 09:54 AM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Old Jim - 08-15-2017, 10:15 AM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Randy Bohannon - 08-15-2017, 11:25 AM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Mike - 08-15-2017, 04:34 PM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Steve Anderson - 08-15-2017, 06:01 PM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Mike - 08-15-2017, 11:40 PM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Don McDowell - 08-15-2017, 06:48 PM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Fogman01 - 08-16-2017, 10:55 AM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Don McDowell - 08-16-2017, 11:41 AM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Lumpy Grits - 08-16-2017, 02:01 PM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Mike - 08-16-2017, 07:55 PM
RE: Buffalo Arms - by Rowdy Rick - 08-16-2017, 09:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication