(06-15-2012, 08:54 AM)Ironramrod Wrote: Klaus, Welcome! I like what you did to your rolling block; nicely done. I didn't see where you mentioned the caliber of your rifle, but judging from the loads you're using it looks like a .45/70. An excellent caliber to be sure, if that is correct. As long as you asked, try increasing your powder charges for both those bullets to see if your groups get smaller for you. Most of these guns perform best w/ close to full throttle loads. I typically shoot 75 gr. Goex 2fg or KIK 2fg in the .45/70 w/ those bullets, and 80 gr. w/ a PJ money bullet or a BACO pp bullet. Try increasing some loads in 2 gr. increments and keep good records of methods and results; your rifle will tell you which load(s) it likes the best.
Your sight combination is a good one and especially for hunting. Most competition shooters prefer vernier tang sights and hooded front sights w/ interchangeable inserts w/ different sight patterns (e.g. apertures, 4 plex, pinheads, posts, etc.).
Regards
IR
Hello Ironramrode,
thx for your warm welcome
`m sorry to forget some info about the Caliber.
Yes it is a 45-70 .
Due the lack of longer Distances as 100 meters and no access to hunt my decision was to have a 45-70 and i`m very pleased with it.
I like opensights and Blade fronts but must admit that a hooded globe front will deliver a better sight picture on target.
For 100m the Frontblade will work well but i will participate on a 300m competition in September and they have a Bucket made of Zinc reduced to 5.5 to 4.7 inches.
I`m afraid that the Blade will cover the whole Bucket at this distance an i ll be not able to /see hit him.
KIK Powder is my new choise but we have no FFg ònly Fg and FFFg.
( seems to be that all FFg are gone to the States)
Due to my Opinon the Fg with 65 - 70grs. compressed by 0,196 inch are the better option as FFFg ?

currently i load 63 grs. FFFG by 0.078 inch compression for the next practical run.
will keep you informed about my results
Klaus