Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy?
04-04-2022, 10:07 AM,
#25
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy?
Yea, a 2 7/8 pushed hard can still be supersonic out to almost 400 yards, if 1500 fps at the muzzle, but it better be a heavy rifle! I don't think I'm man enough to shoot something that through an entire match.

I think it helps to have a bullet designed to deal with the transonic zone, which we can do. We can't do anything about what happens above the flags but hope.

I had mirage running in two different directions at Raton, one way at the top of the targets and the other way at the bottom. And there was a 3rd mirage on the targets. I was a bit overwhelmed.

I've seen some weird shit in the mirage at Lodi too. Every once in a while, I look in my scope and say WTF is that! Ain't it fun.
Jim Kluskens
aka Distant Thunder
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 03-31-2022, 11:51 AM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 03-31-2022, 10:13 PM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 04-01-2022, 11:22 AM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Gunlaker - 04-01-2022, 09:38 PM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 04-02-2022, 10:17 PM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 04-03-2022, 11:21 AM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Distant Thunder - 04-04-2022, 10:07 AM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 04-04-2022, 10:17 AM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 04-04-2022, 11:27 AM
RE: Ballistic Coefficient vs. Accuracy? - by Kurt - 04-04-2022, 07:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication