Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Were they really?
02-11-2019, 04:34 PM,
#14
RE: Were they really?
(02-11-2019, 03:41 PM)Kurt Wrote: I been looking at those testers Kevin and also one of those digital once that don't use an impression, not quite sure just how they read the harness.
That bottom CPA rifle has a .45-90 and the switch barrel that goes with it is in the .44-100 Rem St. but it has a set trigger and it weighs in just under 11# so it would not make the test.

I looked at one that costs over 30k.
It was pretty cool as to what it would tell you what the lead composition was but for that price it better also shoot them all in the X at a 1000.

You should just turn loose of your heavy 74 in 44-100 so I don’t have to build a rifle.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 01:49 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-08-2019, 09:14 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-08-2019, 09:56 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 10:22 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Gunlaker - 02-08-2019, 11:23 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 03:59 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-08-2019, 06:26 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Tom Herman - 02-11-2019, 01:43 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 07:58 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 08:24 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 01:39 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 01:58 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 03:41 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 04:34 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 05:48 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 05:55 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Caprock - 02-14-2019, 09:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication