Historic Shooting Forums › General › The front porch v
Were they really?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Were they really?
02-11-2019, 03:41 PM,
#13
Kurt Offline
Grand advisory committee
*****
 		Posts: 4,247
Location:
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 2
RE: Were they really?
I been looking at those testers Kevin and also one of those digital once that don't use an impression, not quite sure just how they read the harness.
That bottom CPA rifle has a .45-90 and the switch barrel that goes with it is in the .44-100 Rem St. but it has a set trigger and it weighs in just under 11# so it would not make the test.
The reason a dog has so many friends is because he wags his tail instead of his tongue.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 01:49 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-08-2019, 09:14 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-08-2019, 09:56 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 10:22 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Gunlaker - 02-08-2019, 11:23 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Don McDowell - 02-08-2019, 03:59 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-08-2019, 06:26 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Tom Herman - 02-11-2019, 01:43 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 07:58 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 08:24 AM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 01:39 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 01:58 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 03:41 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 04:34 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kurt - 02-11-2019, 05:48 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Kevin Alexander - 02-11-2019, 05:55 PM
RE: Were they really? - by Caprock - 02-14-2019, 09:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication