Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
32-20 with BP: some experiences and conclusions - part 1
05-03-2022, 02:44 AM,
#1
32-20 with BP: some experiences and conclusions - part 1
It's been a while that I have and shoot a 32-20 match rifle for short-range competition. The idea started out with a philosophy of 'just enough gun' for the purpose while staying in the general framework of BP shooting. After all, here where I live, most competitions are short-range, due to the limited availability of decent shooting ranges.
That, and also the availability of the small BSA Martini actions, which are restricted in cartridge size due to barrel tenon size and action length. However, this is a pretty good action, very solid, with a fast lock time and a pretty decent direct trigger. And I am a Martini fan, of course!
Also, as the base rifle is a .22 match rifle (BSA 12/15), it allows one to have a cheap practice rifle with almost identical ergonomics for cheap and cheerful practice.

Why 32-20? Well, it is of course a period-correct cartridge with brass still (more or less) available, and it allows one to use a good selection of both barrels and moulds. Yes indeed, if one uses a standard .308 barrel, which is what I did. Also, it doesn't use gobs of powder and lead (allowing more practice for the same monay), doesn't kick you as hard in a lighter, smaller, better-balanced rifle.

However, not everything is perfect for match use : Standard barrel twist for the 32-20 doesn't allow the use of heavy-for-calibre bullets, which IMO is one of the essentials for both a clean burn and good accuracy. Which is why I went with a 1:12 twist Lothar Walther barrel. And I did design my own mould, a 151gr RN bullet.
Again, the goal was not to maximize muzzle velocity, but best accuracy at short to mid range. To be honest, I haven't yet chrono'd my ammo yet, but I'm guesstimating it to be in a .22LR velocity range. And with the 174gr Pope bullet semi-breechseated, it could well be subsonic.

Of course, the smaller bore size also has some potential downsides: fouling being the main element here. Also, going for a moderate velocity round (subsonic with the heavier bullets) would also be a potential issue, but as its intended use was short range target work, I was hoping this would prove the concept for the distance

This was the general idea behind the development of a single shot 32-20 match rifle

To be continued...
Reply
05-03-2022, 08:35 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-03-2022, 08:36 AM by beltfed.)
#2
RE: 32-20 with BP: some experiences and conclusions - part 1
Martinibelgium,
I look forward to seeing more about your work with the 30-20.
Interesting, it has some following in Schuetzen in this country.
That appears to be mostly with smokeless loads. A friend shoots his 32-20 CPA 44 1/2 rifle
and he is doing quite well with it.
Darn, I used to have a Dublin made rook rifle, that would shoot with 32-20 brass.
I think it was actually chambered for the 300 Sherwood.
Me-to re. I shoot my 12/15 BSA and my Int'l MKII in long range .22 cal matches
I also like shooting my 357Mag rebored Cadet. It does well with 200 grain RN
rifle bullets.
Arnie
Reply
05-03-2022, 09:20 AM,
#3
RE: 32-20 with BP: some experiences and conclusions - part 1
Gert sounds like you've got a fun project going there.
What is your powder charge, and how are you managing fouling in that Martini action?
I have at various times used the 32 wcf in both Colt and Winchesters . Fun little cartridge.
Keep us updated on your exploits please.
A wise man can always be found alone. A weak man can always be found in a crowd.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication