<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Historic Shooting Forums - Bullets and moulds]]></title>
		<link>http://historicshooting.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Historic Shooting Forums - http://historicshooting.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[40-65 mould]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3354.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:02:40 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=0">Steveu</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3354.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[All,<br />
I have a highwall that has a DZ match chamber in a green mountain 16” twist.  I am going to get a mould made and want to know if anyone else has the same chamber and if so, what are you using.  I am leaning towards the money style gg bullet for silhouette.  <br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[All,<br />
I have a highwall that has a DZ match chamber in a green mountain 16” twist.  I am going to get a mould made and want to know if anyone else has the same chamber and if so, what are you using.  I am leaning towards the money style gg bullet for silhouette.  <br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lyman alloy]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3350.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:36:39 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=0">Steveu</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3350.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I was reading an old Lyman handbook that talked about a black powder alloy of 20 parts of lead, 1 part tin and 1 part antimony.   I ran it through the calculator and got a Bhn of 14.  Has anyone tried it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was reading an old Lyman handbook that talked about a black powder alloy of 20 parts of lead, 1 part tin and 1 part antimony.   I ran it through the calculator and got a Bhn of 14.  Has anyone tried it?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pewter]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3301.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:50:13 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=4263">Tgc</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3301.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey guys, has anyone used pewter to blend with lead for bpcr bullets? Pewter scrap claims 92%-95% tin and5%-8% antimony with perhaps some copper,depending upon source. Tim]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey guys, has anyone used pewter to blend with lead for bpcr bullets? Pewter scrap claims 92%-95% tin and5%-8% antimony with perhaps some copper,depending upon source. Tim]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Big piece of lead!]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3235.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 16:28:56 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=2219">Distant Thunder</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3235.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I happened into a pretty big chunk of lead, it is approximately 8.250" x 8.250" by 25".<br />
<br />
I was wondering how much it weighs? It's too heavy to lift that's for sure.<br />
<br />
I would also like to hear any ideas on how I can reduce this block of lead into pieces that will fit in my lead pot.<br />
<br />
I had some bars of lead once that weighed about 50 pounds each and were about 24 inches long. Those I was able to chop into smaller piece with just an axe, this is a bit big for that to work as well.<br />
<br />
Thank you for any help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I happened into a pretty big chunk of lead, it is approximately 8.250" x 8.250" by 25".<br />
<br />
I was wondering how much it weighs? It's too heavy to lift that's for sure.<br />
<br />
I would also like to hear any ideas on how I can reduce this block of lead into pieces that will fit in my lead pot.<br />
<br />
I had some bars of lead once that weighed about 50 pounds each and were about 24 inches long. Those I was able to chop into smaller piece with just an axe, this is a bit big for that to work as well.<br />
<br />
Thank you for any help.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Brass mold]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3223.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:50:17 -0600</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=898">Gussy</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3223.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I have a brass mold, looks new, that is a 355 grn, .433 diam pp design.  I got it in a trade with other stuff.  Not sure exactly what it would be used in.  Seems small for a 45, maybe 44? I don't use PP.<br />
<br />
Accurate #43-355P  brass.<br />
<br />
<br />
If you're handy on a lathe, plenty of meat there!<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=2207" target="_blank" title="">IMG_20220214_115239764_resize_28.jpg</a> (Size: 343.73 KB / Downloads: 17)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have a brass mold, looks new, that is a 355 grn, .433 diam pp design.  I got it in a trade with other stuff.  Not sure exactly what it would be used in.  Seems small for a 45, maybe 44? I don't use PP.<br />
<br />
Accurate #43-355P  brass.<br />
<br />
<br />
If you're handy on a lathe, plenty of meat there!<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=2207" target="_blank" title="">IMG_20220214_115239764_resize_28.jpg</a> (Size: 343.73 KB / Downloads: 17)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[38-55 conundrum]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3126.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:01:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=3">Don McDowell</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3126.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Ok bullet officianados. 14 twist 38-55, what bullet length would be the maximum?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ok bullet officianados. 14 twist 38-55, what bullet length would be the maximum?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Alloy]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3109.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:10:32 -0600</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=3">Don McDowell</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3109.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Now that I have my order placed. <img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/smilies/smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" class="smilie smilie_1" />, it may interest some to know that Buffalo Arms now carries 16-1 alloy, and they have #2 alloy back in stock.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now that I have my order placed. <img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/smilies/smile.gif" alt="Smile" title="Smile" class="smilie smilie_1" />, it may interest some to know that Buffalo Arms now carries 16-1 alloy, and they have #2 alloy back in stock.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Just another mould..or two.]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-3077.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:50:43 -0600</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=564">J.B.</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-3077.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Too much down time with no shooting this year has of course meant I get up to mischief.  Another mould sourced from Jim at BACo with a lot of assistance from Dave Gullo. Dropping back to single diameter pp I requested a .443 nose pour, cup base bullet to use with my thicker necked RMC brass in my 44/77.  Typically the mould arrived and while I've yet to cast a projectile, it looks very tidy indeed. BACo mould ref # JIM433500. This primarily for the 1/17" rifle I hope to see again one day ( its in the U.S. ). <br />
  Not to be outdone.. I contacted Tom at Accurate Molds with regard a dd pp bullet for use in my 50/90. A base pour design...it went from enq to posted in 10 days ! Still on the 'slow plane' currently. This is the first Acc. Mold design I've had done in steel blocks as the curiosity was just too much. Most of my previous designs have come in brass and I couldnt fault them. Perfect form and function. Toms cat. design. #50-655D.  This is for the 1/22" twist but I may go to a shorter version later to be more in line with the 473-500 grn bullet of the original loading.   Just making conversation...our temperatures are averaging 95-105F now...and no shooting scheduled before late January...if bush fire restrictions dont cancel them. Fingers crossed.  My best to all for the festive season. Stay safe, stay well and have a great Christmas.<br />
J.B.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Too much down time with no shooting this year has of course meant I get up to mischief.  Another mould sourced from Jim at BACo with a lot of assistance from Dave Gullo. Dropping back to single diameter pp I requested a .443 nose pour, cup base bullet to use with my thicker necked RMC brass in my 44/77.  Typically the mould arrived and while I've yet to cast a projectile, it looks very tidy indeed. BACo mould ref # JIM433500. This primarily for the 1/17" rifle I hope to see again one day ( its in the U.S. ). <br />
  Not to be outdone.. I contacted Tom at Accurate Molds with regard a dd pp bullet for use in my 50/90. A base pour design...it went from enq to posted in 10 days ! Still on the 'slow plane' currently. This is the first Acc. Mold design I've had done in steel blocks as the curiosity was just too much. Most of my previous designs have come in brass and I couldnt fault them. Perfect form and function. Toms cat. design. #50-655D.  This is for the 1/22" twist but I may go to a shorter version later to be more in line with the 473-500 grn bullet of the original loading.   Just making conversation...our temperatures are averaging 95-105F now...and no shooting scheduled before late January...if bush fire restrictions dont cancel them. Fingers crossed.  My best to all for the festive season. Stay safe, stay well and have a great Christmas.<br />
J.B.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Old West Bullet Moulds]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-2934.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:52:15 -0600</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=0">Steveu</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-2934.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anyone have any experience with this company?  I am looking at the hollow base moulds they make.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does anyone have any experience with this company?  I am looking at the hollow base moulds they make.<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New trick?]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-2927.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2020 13:42:27 -0600</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=3">Don McDowell</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-2927.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Working on getting the bullet supply built back up after loading for Phoenix. I 've always been sort of puzzled as to why the first few bullets cast and dropped into the box seem to come out light. Sort of aggravating to have to cull out perfectly good bullets because they're beyond the tolerance weight.<br />
 So today when the Mag 25 came to temp, I grabbed the thermometer and just touched about the first inch in the top of the melt, sure nuff, it was a bit under what I like to run my alloy at. So waited a couple of more minutes and with the temp up , I cast 1 bullet from each mould, yup close but no bananas . To end this diatribe what I found was after the 3rd cast from each mould the bullets were well with in my sort range... <br />
 Think I'll keep on doing this with the thermometer, and just cast 3 put those in the sprue can , then start keeping this shiny looking buggers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Working on getting the bullet supply built back up after loading for Phoenix. I 've always been sort of puzzled as to why the first few bullets cast and dropped into the box seem to come out light. Sort of aggravating to have to cull out perfectly good bullets because they're beyond the tolerance weight.<br />
 So today when the Mag 25 came to temp, I grabbed the thermometer and just touched about the first inch in the top of the melt, sure nuff, it was a bit under what I like to run my alloy at. So waited a couple of more minutes and with the temp up , I cast 1 bullet from each mould, yup close but no bananas . To end this diatribe what I found was after the 3rd cast from each mould the bullets were well with in my sort range... <br />
 Think I'll keep on doing this with the thermometer, and just cast 3 put those in the sprue can , then start keeping this shiny looking buggers.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hollow base mould makers]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-2925.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 09:14:43 -0600</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=0">Steveu</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-2925.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[All,<br />
<br />
Are there any mould makers that make hollow base rifle moulds?  I have been reading about on the 43 Spanish and it seem that the best GG bullets were from Remington and they were hollow based.   The Lyman mould looks like a good copy of the original bullet, but it has a flat base.  I am not interested in PP bullets.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[All,<br />
<br />
Are there any mould makers that make hollow base rifle moulds?  I have been reading about on the 43 Spanish and it seem that the best GG bullets were from Remington and they were hollow based.   The Lyman mould looks like a good copy of the original bullet, but it has a flat base.  I am not interested in PP bullets.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Undersized bullets]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-2883.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:18:23 -0600</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=0">Steveu</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-2883.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I have recently acquired a Hoch 500gr Creedmoor mould for my Trapdoor and Rem-Lee 1885 that is supposed to be dropping bullets .459".  I cast some up this afternoon with some 20-1 @750 degrees and the bullets are .455" diameter.  Bullets look great, just .004" too small.  Can I lap the mould or should I send it back for a refund?<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have recently acquired a Hoch 500gr Creedmoor mould for my Trapdoor and Rem-Lee 1885 that is supposed to be dropping bullets .459".  I cast some up this afternoon with some 20-1 @750 degrees and the bullets are .455" diameter.  Bullets look great, just .004" too small.  Can I lap the mould or should I send it back for a refund?<br />
<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Casting up 44-40's]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-2872.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:40:40 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=773">Eric Johanen</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-2872.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[My supply of bullets is just about gone so I warmed up the pot and cast up some new bullets with my new Accurate Molds dual cavity mold.  43-215C  and 43-220C.  Ran through my lube/sizer using the .429 die and they come out at .428 which is just perfect for my WW and Remington brass.  Larger than .428 using the Remington brass they chamber very tight in my 1875 revolver.  They shoot nicely in my  1875,  Schofield and 1873 rifle with both black and smokeless powders.  Weight is 215C at 216 grains and from 220C at 219 grains.  This is using a relatively soft mix.  I'll load up the 220C with American Select and test them at my local indoor range and see how accurate they are.<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=1528" target="_blank" title="">Accurate Molds 44-40 43-215C &amp; 43-220.JPG</a> (Size: 2.27 MB / Downloads: 12)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=1529" target="_blank" title="">Accurate Molds 44-40.JPG</a> (Size: 1.96 MB / Downloads: 12)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[My supply of bullets is just about gone so I warmed up the pot and cast up some new bullets with my new Accurate Molds dual cavity mold.  43-215C  and 43-220C.  Ran through my lube/sizer using the .429 die and they come out at .428 which is just perfect for my WW and Remington brass.  Larger than .428 using the Remington brass they chamber very tight in my 1875 revolver.  They shoot nicely in my  1875,  Schofield and 1873 rifle with both black and smokeless powders.  Weight is 215C at 216 grains and from 220C at 219 grains.  This is using a relatively soft mix.  I'll load up the 220C with American Select and test them at my local indoor range and see how accurate they are.<!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=1528" target="_blank" title="">Accurate Molds 44-40 43-215C &amp; 43-220.JPG</a> (Size: 2.27 MB / Downloads: 12)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment --><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="http://historicshooting.com/images/attachtypes/image.gif" title="JPG Image" border="0" alt=".jpg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=1529" target="_blank" title="">Accurate Molds 44-40.JPG</a> (Size: 1.96 MB / Downloads: 12)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hoch mould handles]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-2778.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 05:45:27 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1738">Kevin Alexander</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-2778.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Where do you get them for 40 and 45 caliber Hoch moulds?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where do you get them for 40 and 45 caliber Hoch moulds?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bullet hardness tester]]></title>
			<link>http://historicshooting.com/thread-2774.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 22:53:03 -0500</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="http://historicshooting.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=12">Stephen Borud</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicshooting.com/thread-2774.html</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[What brand do you all recommend for a bullet hardness tester?<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
SB]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[What brand do you all recommend for a bullet hardness tester?<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks<br />
SB]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>