Load Details

[Dan]

Yes sir, I certainly did, and it certainly is a different view that does not surprise. Matter of perspective I hold Kenny's word in high regard on such matters. Was thinking about some of his experiences and reports whilst typing on the other forum, but it's difficult sometimes to make theory and fact congruent. There is seldom enough data to do that in internet forums. I know some 'experts' would disagree.

Some years ago I was reading McCoy's book and one of the things that struck me was that with the passing of time and improved technical capability, the imponderables of ballistic science have grown less murky. The water is still turbid though, here and there. Just a few weeks ago a 16 year old kid in Germany solved a physics problem posed by Newton centuries ago and never solved until now. The kid just turned exterior ballistic science upside down and the future will be interesting.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/05/27/...ac-newton/


What was it they said, "Theory is fine in the absence of fact."??? Works for me...both ways.