Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Baco Jim 442 500
12-27-2022, 07:57 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-27-2022, 07:58 PM by GrumpyBear.)
#13
RE: Baco Jim 442 500
(12-27-2022, 04:47 PM)Tgc Wrote: Grumpybear, if not too late you might consider reducing the ogive diameter by .002". That would help with being able to see the transition from bore diameter to the start of the nose. Tim

Thanks.

But too late, its in my hands already, we'll have to see how it pans out.

And this is for some of my .45 cal rifles.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-26-2022, 07:00 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by DirtySteve - 12-26-2022, 08:04 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by beltfed - 12-26-2022, 11:39 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 12:09 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 12:44 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Kurt - 12-27-2022, 11:36 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 12:46 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-27-2022, 03:41 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 04:47 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-27-2022, 07:57 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 06:21 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 06:43 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 07:54 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 11:51 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-28-2022, 08:56 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-28-2022, 10:40 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-28-2022, 01:25 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-28-2022, 05:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication