Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Baco Jim 442 500
12-27-2022, 04:47 PM,
#9
RE: Baco Jim 442 500
Grumpybear, if not too late you might consider reducing the ogive diameter by .002". That would help with being able to see the transition from bore diameter to the start of the nose. Tim
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-26-2022, 07:00 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by DirtySteve - 12-26-2022, 08:04 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by beltfed - 12-26-2022, 11:39 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 12:09 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 12:44 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Kurt - 12-27-2022, 11:36 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 12:46 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-27-2022, 03:41 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 04:47 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-27-2022, 07:57 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 06:21 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Tgc - 12-27-2022, 06:43 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 07:54 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-27-2022, 11:51 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-28-2022, 08:56 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-28-2022, 10:40 AM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by GrumpyBear - 12-28-2022, 01:25 PM
RE: Baco Jim 442 500 - by Don McDowell - 12-28-2022, 05:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication