Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
44-77 continuing development
06-03-2021, 05:05 PM,
#1
44-77 continuing development
As I continue the load development with my Shiloh .44-77 17-twsit it is quite apparent that the rifle prefers the BACO JIM430520 bullet if I'm going to seat my bullets a bit deeper in an attempt to use less powder.

The .44-77 case will easily hold 90+ grains of my Swiss 1 1/2 with a shallowly seated paper patch bullet. I just don't see the need for much over 85 grains for any of my shooting. I have progressively seated my paper patch bullets shallower and shallower in my .45-70 and .40-65 and with very shallow seating in those two cartridges I have found an improvement in accuracy.

Doing the same in the .44-77 SBN also give very good accuracy, but requires more powder or some sort of a wad stack. Since I have never personally had any luck with multiple wads in and BP cartridge and noting that others have had success with the .44-77 with their bullets seated deeper as well a deeper seating being used in original .44-77s and .44-90s cartridges I decided to give that a try.

The deeper seating, around .300" in the case, has shot better than I would have thought, but I noticed that my .44-77 shoots even better with a bit more compression than I was using with 86 grains of my Swiss 1 1/2.

At a recent gong match I tried a few different loadings, two with the 430520 BACO bullet. I should note that I opened up this mold to cast at .432" because it seemed to be a bit looser in the bore than I would like and that is when it started to shoot even better for me.

The only difference between the two loads using this bullet was the seating depth. I seat some of them with .030" more compression and that was the load I shot at 400 yards at the match last weekend. Just shooting at gongs it seem to shoot as well as the same load with .030" less compression.

The third load I tried use a BACO 441505EPP bullet and 85 grains of Swiss 1 1/2. That is a 2-diameter designed to seat pretty shallow for Shiloh's standard chamber. I thought I would seat it deeper and see how that did, which didn't prove to be very well at the match at 500 yards.

So this week I decided to shoot both of these loads here at home at 220 yards from the prone off sticks so I would get a good picture of what each is doing shooting under match conditions.

It quickly became obvious why I had trouble at 500 with my 2-D EPP bullet seated deep. The core group was around 4" but the was one way high and one way low! and that is exactly what I saw at 500, a perfect pin wheel followed by a miss low and then a miss high.

The 430520 (432") shot very well with two shots that were just out of the group and totally on call and a third one that was a lot more right that I thought it broke. Some of that right may have been the gusts that were starting come as a front moved in. By the time I was done shooting this last group the gusts were rolling in from the left pretty noticeably as I walked down to retrieve the target. The rain followed behind the wind. I had finished my shooting just in time. The target in the picture is the 430520. The core group of 7 shots are pretty impressive as are the two sights at 6 o'clock before I raised the scope setting 1.5 moa.



I clearly need to work on my hold so I can break more of my shots in the center. That's one thing I don't like about a scope it's that you see every little movement as the crosshairs dance around in the middle of the target.


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Jim Kluskens
aka Distant Thunder
Reply


Messages In This Thread
44-77 continuing development - by Distant Thunder - 06-03-2021, 05:05 PM
RE: 44-77 continuing development - by Kurt - 06-04-2021, 10:08 AM
RE: 44-77 continuing development - by Kurt - 06-04-2021, 06:19 PM
RE: 44-77 continuing development - by Kurt - 06-07-2021, 02:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication