Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Development of PP loads for the .44-77.
07-02-2020, 12:00 AM,
RE: Development of PP loads for the .44-77.
Yep... sounds like ..other than the transition.. our chambers are identical. The .467 is fine and actually about what my cases come out after firing.. but the .442 inside is a tad on the snug side for gg.. although, given your destination, may actually prove a good move with pp. Just the variations in what is or has been available gets a little tedious if trying to maintain some consistency in wrap thickness or just bullet diameter and tension overall. I was actually looking at ordering 50-60 of those BACo 50/110 variants to add to my stocks as it just pays to have some in reserve. I may still go that way and they'll be on the shelf if I need them. Sooner have a hundred too many than thirty... too few. There's still doom and gloom about International travel next year Sad but I'll pick leave in June regardless...hoping I can make the pilgrimage once again. Need to wrap a few of the latest Kal mould and see how they look and chamber over 82-84 grains of Swiss 1.5. Big Grin
regards.. Gavin.
" Don't know where I'm going but there's no sense being late " !
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Development of PP loads for the .44-77. - by Gunlaker - 06-29-2020, 09:24 AM
RE: Development of PP loads for the .44-77. - by Gunlaker - 06-29-2020, 05:59 PM
RE: Development of PP loads for the .44-77. - by seahawk - 07-01-2020, 10:08 AM
RE: Development of PP loads for the .44-77. - by J.B. - 07-02-2020, 12:00 AM
RE: Development of PP loads for the .44-77. - by Steveu - 07-31-2020, 11:16 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication