Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thin paper v thick paper?
09-28-2018, 12:38 PM,
#5
RE: Thin paper v thick paper?
I would vote for the 9# paper, only because it is in a ream. I find it easier to handle than rolled up paper. It keeps curling up while I'm trying to cut it. Frankly, either paper will work very well. Last year I ordered a bullet that casts .395" because the .396 was very snug (good) but I worried that I might wrinkle a patch trying to load quickly during a match. The bullet was a little loose wrapped with Seth Cole paper but shot very well. I have some loads wrapped with 9# onion skin but I have not had a chance to shoot them. I'm sure it will work very well too, they fit very well.

Get your mould cut to fit which ever paper will be easiest to get in the future. Which ever way you go, I'm sure you will get good results.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Thin paper v thick paper? - by MIEagle - 09-26-2018, 06:43 PM
RE: Thin paper v thick paper? - by Don McDowell - 09-26-2018, 09:08 PM
RE: Thin paper v thick paper? - by MIEagle - 09-28-2018, 06:22 AM
RE: Thin paper v thick paper? - by Don McDowell - 09-28-2018, 08:50 AM
RE: Thin paper v thick paper? - by MikeR - 09-28-2018, 12:38 PM
RE: Thin paper v thick paper? - by mherth - 09-28-2018, 02:53 PM
RE: Thin paper v thick paper? - by MIEagle - 09-28-2018, 05:15 PM
RE: Thin paper v thick paper? - by MikeR - 09-28-2018, 11:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication