Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dark VS lite loads
01-06-2018, 09:04 PM,
#2
RE: Dark VS lite loads
I started out shooting distant dingers several years ago with Smokeless and I'm glad I did. Lots of fun but more importantly it lead me to Black Powder and BPCR.

I'm read everything I could on powders the older my guns got and they got older quick as most all moderns were sold for vintage guns. I especially relied on Sherman Bell in coming to prefer a very narrow range of powders that produce a pressure curve less dramatic than Black in the chamber and all the way down the bore. He used strain gauges at both the chamber and at spacing down the bore. I don't deviate when I do shoot smokeless but have to say that Black Powder consumes nearly all my time anymore.

No one can argue there is not increased risk with double charges so all I say to anyone dabbling is "do your research, rely on evidence and not what someone posts, and practice triple-checks when loading reduced loads".
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Dark VS lite loads - by Martini2 - 08-30-2017, 09:48 AM
RE: Dark VS lite loads - by SgtDog0311 - 01-06-2018, 09:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication