Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
smaller then bore slicks
08-29-2012, 10:14 PM,
#5
RE: smaller then bore slicks
thanks Gary...this has been my observation as well but it still seems tempting for some stupid reason. i had a browning re-barreled and by the time i got done with all the stuff i wanted it cost me slightly more then a new shiloh and i could have easily purchased another BPCR browning or winchester for less dollars.

i just have not gotten my bore size and under slicks to shoot yet and maybe that is the length and weight for the twist having more to do with it all...dont know yet!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 08-29-2012, 01:10 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Don McDowell - 08-29-2012, 01:25 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 08-29-2012, 02:03 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 08-29-2012, 02:48 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Kurt - 08-31-2012, 09:51 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 08-29-2012, 10:14 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bobw - 08-29-2012, 10:52 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Don McDowell - 08-29-2012, 11:45 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by rdnck - 08-31-2012, 08:52 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 09-01-2012, 12:37 AM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 09-02-2012, 04:07 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 09-03-2012, 06:17 AM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 09-03-2012, 12:14 PM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by bigted - 09-06-2012, 03:49 AM
RE: smaller then bore slicks - by Lumpy Grits - 09-06-2012, 11:57 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication