Historic Shooting Forums › General › Reloading › Bullets and moulds v
lead/tin vs. Lyman #2

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
lead/tin vs. Lyman #2
12-10-2015, 07:51 PM,
#9
Hiwall55 Offline
Senior Member
****
 		Posts: 446
Location: West central Illinois
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 0
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2
I tried a different mix of alloy for my money bullets and it looks promising. You mix it 3-7, for my pot I use 3x7 of Lyman #2=21 pounds, then 7x7 of pure lead =49 pounds. 21+49 = 70 pounds of mix. Susposed to be 96-2-2 alloy. Seems to work well with no nose slump.
Bill
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-09-2015, 01:54 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Semtav - 12-09-2015, 02:50 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by bruce moulds - 12-09-2015, 03:12 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-09-2015, 04:56 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Hiwall55 - 12-09-2015, 07:48 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-10-2015, 08:37 AM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Kurt - 12-10-2015, 12:34 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Martini2 - 12-10-2015, 01:43 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Hiwall55 - 12-10-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-10-2015, 08:36 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Martini2 - 12-12-2015, 10:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication