Historic Shooting Forums › General › Reloading › Bullets and moulds v
lead/tin vs. Lyman #2

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
lead/tin vs. Lyman #2
12-09-2015, 04:56 PM,
#4
laowho Offline
Member
***
 		Posts: 173
Location:
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 0
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2
Thanks Semtav and Bruce,

Figured I'd avoid WWs what with all the substitute materials they've been usin across various states, but all-in-all this is great news as I'd rather keep everything as simple as possible and cuz I won't have to buy the Lyman #2 alloy. The tin's already been ordered and I have 40 lbs pure lead to use. Cheers, Doug
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-09-2015, 01:54 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Semtav - 12-09-2015, 02:50 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by bruce moulds - 12-09-2015, 03:12 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-09-2015, 04:56 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Hiwall55 - 12-09-2015, 07:48 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-10-2015, 08:37 AM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Kurt - 12-10-2015, 12:34 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Martini2 - 12-10-2015, 01:43 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Hiwall55 - 12-10-2015, 07:51 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by laowho - 12-10-2015, 08:36 PM
RE: lead/tin vs. Lyman #2 - by Martini2 - 12-12-2015, 10:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | HistoricShooting.com | Return to Top | | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication