![]() |
|
My Bison Rant for Today - Printable Version +- Historic Shooting Forums (http://historicshooting.com) +-- Forum: General (http://historicshooting.com/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: The front porch (http://historicshooting.com/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: My Bison Rant for Today (/thread-2855.html) |
My Bison Rant for Today - Caprock - 10-06-2019 The term Bison is not new nor novel . Carl Linnaeus knew what it was when he named it in 1758 and so did the luminaries of the day yet the term Buffalo became the nom de plume used by the vast majority of people. Likewise, the term buffalo is firmly entrenched in American literature and lore until recently when its usage became intertwined in the race to revise nearly all US history. We've known what it was for hundreds of years for God's sake why have they seized the mantle of intellectual superiority and deemed it ignorant to call it buffalo? I don't get confused when you use it and assume you mean Bison bison unless you mention Cape or African buffalo to distinguish from perhaps water buffalo. I don't gripe about Prairie Dogs not really being dogs......I know that you are talking about a type of ground squirrel that lives in colonies and barks like a chihuahua in heat. I don't call Prairie Chickens grouse even though thats what they are, who knows what to call Mountain Lion or really cares except maybe to define a geographical region. I could go on on with other examples but you get my griff in that we are fooling ourselves by appearing to be informed by exclusively using the scientific term for an iconic animal we have long called buffalo. Hell, I was a scientist/biologist in a former life and have the sheepskins to back it up but I'm not on a mission to erase 250 plus years of history based on semantics. If I were giving a lecture on grassland ecology to international audiences of course the correct terminology usage is in order with popular names being secondary. However, within the confines of discourse here I'm not going look over my glasses and smirk as I correct you "Well, thats actually a Bison bison and not a buffalo you know!" Rant over.....I must go oil my bison firearms. RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Don McDowell - 10-06-2019 I'm a gonna bisom ammo and go shoot me a buffler one of these days..
RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Caprock - 10-06-2019 (10-06-2019, 07:26 PM)Don McDowell Wrote: You may sneak that past the hugger crowd but for gawd's sake don''t shoot a Bison! RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Don McDowell - 10-06-2019 LOL RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Hiwall55 - 10-07-2019 Good one, Don. I might bisom too. RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Don McDowell - 10-07-2019 Yup I think we should all bisom and go shoot us a buffler.
RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Rowdy Rick - 10-07-2019 (10-06-2019, 05:14 PM)Caprock Wrote: The term Bison is not new nor novel . Carl Linnaeus knew what it was when he named it in 1758 and so did the luminaries of the day yet the term Buffalo became the nom de plume used by the vast majority of people. Likewise, the term buffalo is firmly entrenched in American literature and lore until recently when its usage became intertwined in the race to revise nearly all US history. We've known what it was for hundreds of years for God's sake why have they seized the mantle of intellectual superiority and deemed it ignorant to call it buffalo? I don't get confused when you use it and assume you mean Bison bison unless you mention Cape or African buffalo to distinguish from perhaps water buffalo. I don't gripe about Prairie Dogs not really being dogs......I know that you are talking about a type of ground squirrel that lives in colonies and barks like a chihuahua in heat. I don't call Prairie Chickens grouse even though thats what they are, who knows what to call Mountain Lion or really cares except maybe to define a geographical region. I could go on on with other examples but you get my griff in that we are fooling ourselves by appearing to be informed by exclusively using the scientific term for an iconic animal we have long called buffalo. Hell, I was a scientist/biologist in a former life and have the sheepskins to back it up but I'm not on a mission to erase 250 plus years of history based on semantics. If I were giving a lecture on grassland ecology to international audiences of course the correct terminology usage is in order with popular names being secondary. However, within the confines of discourse here I'm not going look over my glasses and smirk as I correct you "Well, thats actually a Bison bison and not a buffalo you know!" RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Rowdy Rick - 10-07-2019 I agree totally and a big AMEN to what you wrote Caprock! Bison was the scientific name and buffalo was the common name, even back in they 1870's. If you are writing a scientific article the term "Bison" is more correct. If you are writing or talking about Buffalo Guns and Buffalo hunts the name Buffalo is the only correct name ![]() Not sure why this didn't include on my previous post Rick RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Rowdy Rick - 10-07-2019 I actually addressed this a bit in an upcoming article for The American Sharps Shooters. Rick RE: My Bison Rant for Today - Caprock - 10-07-2019 (10-07-2019, 12:55 PM)Rowdy Rick Wrote: I actually addressed this a bit in an upcoming article for The American Sharps Shooters. Look forward to reading it! Even the great naturalist William Hornaday entitles his topic the "American Bison or Buffalo" then goes on to use Buffalo throughout his descriptions. |